Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > backgrounder > Terrorism Havens: Colombia
Updated: December 2005
Yes. While the country has no known ties to al-Qaeda’s brand of global terrorism, Colombia’s ongoing civil war, feeble central government, powerful guerrillas and paramilitary groups, and wealthy drug lords have made the country a sanctuary for homegrown terrorist groups that carry out bombings, extortion, kidnapping, and assassination.
The republic of Colombia, population 42 million, is a democracy in northern South America. It shares borders with Brazil, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela and is approximately three times the size of California .
Colombia has a long history of violence and unrest, including La Violencia, the 1948-58 civil war that claimed more than 200,000 lives. In the early 1960s, leftist militant groups—such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN)—began to wage guerrilla war against the government throughout the countryside. After Colombia became the hub of the global cocaine trade in the 1980s, the violent Cali and Medellín drug cartels gained power and caused more havoc. The late 1980s and early 1990s saw the emergence of rightist paramilitary forces. Known as the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, or AUC, they were backed principally by drug kingpins and rural business leaders. Today, the FARC, the ELN, and the AUC—motivated by a mix of ideology, hunger for drug money, and desire for power—engage in terrorism and the narcotics trade, despite the U.S. aid package known as Plan Colombia .
Plan Colombia , which began in 2000 and made Colombia the third-largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid, is a multibillion-dollar aid program designed to help Colombia ’s chronically weak government combat narcotrafficking. The plan provides for 800 U.S. advisers—half of them military—and includes programs to train and equip Colombia’s military and police, interdict drug shipments, and help peasants cultivate crops other than the coca used to make cocaine. U.S. Special Forces have trained three counternarcotics battalions as prototypes of an improved Colombian Army, which historically has been one of Latin America ’s weakest. But congressional critics have blasted Plan Colombia for failing to: reduce Colombia’s cocaine output; break ties between Colombia ’s armed forces and paramilitary groups; wean coca-growing peasants from their deadly crop; and adequately protect the U.S. citizens who, as private security contractors, conduct risky aerial drug eradication flights. The Bush administration shifted Plan Colombia funding to focus not only on drugs but also on the rebel forces besieging the country’s weak central government. In August 2002, President Bush signed antiterrorism legislation authorizing Colombia to use U.S. aid previously earmarked for counterdrug operations to directly combat the FARC, the ELN, and the AUC.
The program is funded through 2005, with three-quarters of the approximately $600 million per year in aid to Colombia earmarked for the military and police. The remaining funds are for social, economic, and humanitarian programs. U.S. policy experts are divided about Plan Colombia’s successor: whether the counter-drug policy focus should be continued, or whether to implement a new program involving European and other countries in a broad strategy that links security and the drug war to economic development and institution building in Colombia . Those who support expanding assistance to Colombia warn that, until drug use in the United States and Europe drops dramatically, poor farmers won’t stop growing illicit crops. While most experts believe ending major assistance to Colombia would be a mistake, there is some discussion in Congress on crafting a “U.S. exit strategy” from Colombia .
Because its central government is extremely weak—battered by leftist rebels who have long controlled the countryside, rightist paramilitary armies, and an out-of-control drug trade that funds both sides and fuels the cycle of chaos. These problems are exacerbated by the steady demand for cocaine throughout the United States and Europe. Experts say the burden is simply too much for the state to shoulder alone, but note that an important element of engagement with Colombia is strengthening its security and other institutions.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
