Home | Site Index | FAQs | Contact | RSS  | Podcast

• Related Materials

  • Samore: More Fluid U.S. Stance on N. Korea Nuclear Weapons
    Interview
    April 23, 2008

  • Crisis Guide: The Korean Peninsula
    Interactive
    January 29, 2007

  • President Bush's Statement on North Korea Nuclear Test
    Essential Documents
    October 9, 2006

  • DPRK Successfully Conducts Underground Nuclear Test
    Essential Documents
    October 9, 2006

  • Negotiating with North Korea: Carnegie International Non-Proliferation Conference
    Must Read
    November 8, 2005

  See Also

  North Korea, Proliferation, Weapons of Mass Destruction, State Sponsors of Terrorism

  Hot Topics from GlobalSecurity.org

  • Next Generation Bomber
    
  • Op. Iraqi Freedom: 5 Years
    
  • VH-71 Marine One Problems
    
  • KC-45 Tanker Boeing v. Airbus
    
  • F-117A Nighthawk
    

  More From:

  GlobalSecurity.org

  ISN Security Watch

  • The world's water future
    
  • ISN Podcasts: The Cyprus issue
    
  • Rattling imaginary sabres
    
  • ISN Podcasts: China, more friend than foe
    
  • East Timor: Hard rock, soft water
    

  More From:

  International Relations and Security Network

  State Sponsors: North Korea

  Author:	Vikaas Sharma

  Updated: June 28, 2008

  • Introduction
  • Support of Terrorist Activities
  • Relationship with other State Sponsors of Terrorism
  • Development of Nuclear Weapons Program
  • Possession of Non-Nuclear WMDs
  • Nuclear Weapons Delivery Capability

  ---

  Introduction

  Editor's Note: On June 26, 2008, after Pyongyang handed over a declaration of its nuclear activities, President Bush said he intended to remove North Korea from the terrorism list within forty-five days.

  North Korea, also known as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), is the world’s only unreconstructed Stalinist country. Under its current leader, Kim Jong-Il, North Korea maintains its border with South Korea as the most heavily fortified national boundary in the world. Human rights groups accuse North Korea’s government of a plethora of human rights violations. The DPRK is also cited on the U.S. State Department’s list of countries that sponsor terrorism and has been deemed by President Bush as a member of the “axis of evil.” On October 9, 2006, North Korea became a nuclear-weapon state, conducting its first nuclear test and raising global security concerns. In 2003, the United States along with China, Russia, Japan, and South Korea—countries with particular security concerns—established diplomatic negotiations with North Korea known as the Six-Party Talks. These ongoing talks led to an October 2007 North Korean pledge to release all information pertaining to its nuclear program and to disable all nuclear facilities under international supervision, though verification methods remain uncertain.

  Support of Terrorist Activities

  North Korea has not been associated with any acts of terrorism since 1987, when it was linked to the bombing of a Korean Airlines flight. However, Japan claims that North Korea bears responsibility for the abduction of several Japanese citizens, a sore point for Japan in the Six-Party Talks. North Korea’s admission to conducting a secret nuclear weapons program in violation of the Agreed Framework of 1994, which prohibited such programs, raises questions about other pledges Pyongyang offers. So, too, do North Korea’s alleged frequent sales of nuclear and ballistic missile technology. In connection with concessions made in the Six-Party Talks in late 2007, the U.S. State Department said it will “begin the process of removing the designation of the DPRK as a state-sponsor of terrorism.” Although many countries see North Korea’s potential to sell nuclear technology as a threat, the more imminent concern is North Korea’s own nuclear capabilities. Consequently, much international attention is focused on North Korea’s adherence to IAEA inspections and the dismantling of its nuclear arsenal.

  Relationship with other State Sponsors of Terrorism

  It has been reported that North Korea sold ballistic-missile technology to Iran and Syria, both of which are on the U.S. State department’s list of sponsors of terrorism, and Libya, which was removed from the list in 2006. North Korean missile technology has also been transferred to Pakistan and Yemen. The alleged missile sales represent a prime concern for the U.S.-led “war on terrorism,” expanding the range of receiving nations that could potentially deploy their own chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons. Yet the sales also generate much needed income for North Korea, allowing it to further its own military research and development. Following a September 2007 Israeli air strike in Syria, some analysts speculated that Pyongyang had sold nuclear material to Damascus, which Israel then discovered and destroyed.

  Development of Nuclear Weapons Program

  North Korea finished construction on its first nuclear reactor in 1987. With a capacity of five megawatts, it is capable of producing enough uranium fuel for the creation of one nuclear bomb each year. In 1984, construction began on two more powerful reactors—one fifty megawatts, the other two-hundred. When operational, it is estimated that these reactors would be able to produce roughly thirty bombs per year. Along with these reactors, North Korea also has created a reprocessing plant which serves to extract weapons grade plutonium from nuclear fuel rods from the reactors. It has been noted that North Korea’s reactors are not being used as power plants because satellite imagery shows that there are no electric power lines coming from these facilities. Roughly three thousand scientists are working on the country’s nuclear research and development projects, but experts say it is hard to estimate the rate at which these programs are developing.

  North Korea’s nuclear facilities violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which the country signed in 1985 but backed out of in April 2003. They also violate the Agreed Framework of 1994, which North Korea denounced with its nuclear test.

  Possession of Non-Nuclear WMDs

  Many experts say North Korea has both chemical and biological weapons programs which range from the use of agents such as VX and Sarin to Anthrax and Botulin. The extent to which these agents have been weaponized is unknown as no internationally regulated inspections are conducted. The U.S. Department of Defense says that North Korea has stockpiles of chemical weapons and the capability to produce certain agents in mass quantities. North Korea has signed the Biological Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), which is a multilateral effort to ban the production of biological and chemical weapons. Yet this treaty doesn’t require systematic inspections. North Korea’s ambiguous statement in October 2002 about possessing weapons more powerful than nuclear weapons has led experts to interpret this as a declaration of possessing biological/chemical weapons. Although North Korea has signed the BTWC it has not signed the Chemical Weapons Convention, a more recent effort to ban the production of chemical weapons and also mandating inspections.

  Nuclear Weapons Delivery Capability

  North Korea has developed several missiles that can reach a target of up to 1,550 miles. The Nodong-1 missile is a short range missile capable of roughly 720 miles while the BM-25 is capable of 1,550 miles. It is not certain whether these missiles are in fact able to carry WMD payloads. Development has begun on a longer ranged ballistic missile Taepodong-2 which could theoretically hit a target as far as three thousand miles, almost three times the range of its predecessor, the Taepodong-1. Current North Korean missiles pose a threat to countries in East Asia, but with a completed Taepodong-2, this threat would broaden even to parts of the United States. CFR.org’s Crisis Guide on the Korean Peninsula details the North Korean military arsenal.

   

  Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.

• 

  New CFR Books

  

  In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.

  

  America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.

  

  In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.

  Complete list of CFR Books.

  

  

  New Independent Task Force Reports

  Confronting Climate Change

  This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.

  U.S.-Latin America Relations: A New Direction for a New Reality

  This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.

  About Independent Task Forces at the Council.

  

  

  New Council Special Reports

  Global FDI Policy

  After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.

  Dealing with Damascus

  In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.

  Complete list of Council Special Reports.

  

  

  Robert Mugabe's 1987 Article

  • “Struggle for Southern Africa:” In a 1987 Foreign Affairs article, then Prime Minister Robert Mugabe urged international intervention to protect southern Africa.

  

  

  

  Publications Information

  To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.

  For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.

  

  

  Permissions Requests

  To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.

  Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.

  You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.

  

  

•  

By Region  |  By Issue  |  By Publication Type  |  The Think Tank  |  For The Media  |  For Educators  |  About CFR

Home  |  Site Index  |  FAQ  |  Contact  |  RSS  |  Podcast

Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.